CWEALF

Site Search

Information and Referral: 1800-479-2949

Educational Equity
CT Girls and Technology Network

Hot Topics
CWEALF celebrates 31 years.

Todays Fact
Eighty-five percent (85%) of Asian women business owners have a senior management team in place. In comparison, 77% of African American women business owners, 74% of Latina business owners, and 71% of Caucasian women business owners have senior management teams.

HomeAbout UsProgramsPress RoomResourcesJoin UsContact us  
 

Legal Advocacy

CWEALF practices legal advocacy by signing onto amicus briefs. Through these briefs, we hope to raise the concerns of women and to ensure their experiences are considered when policies and laws are established or reformed.

Recent examples of activities CWEALF has participated in include the Office for Health Care Access (OHCA) case regarding the purchase of Sharon Hospital by a private company. The work of CWEALF, on behalf of the Coalition for Choice, ensured that the sale of the hospital was contingent on the provision of reproductive health care for patients. This was the first case of its kind in Connecticut and an important victory for the Pro-choice movement.

CWEALF, represented by Maureen Murphy (then CWEALF board member), was involved in the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) case related to the inclusion of the Boy Scouts in the state employee charitable campaign. The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) alleged that Connecticut State Employees Campaign violated its rights of freedom of speech and freedom of association by disallowing the BSA to participate in the Campaign because they exclude open homosexuals from leadership positions. In July, 2002, the United States District Court, District of Connecticut denied the BSA’s motion for summary judgement. The BSA’s appealed this decision and on July 9, 2003, the federal appeals court ruled that the State of Connecticut may exclude the Boy Scouts of America from the State Employee Charitable Campaign because of the Boy Scouts’ anti-gay policy.

Amicus Briefs

For the past thirty years, CWEALF has written and participated in amicus curiae briefs in order to ensure that women’s concerns are heard when laws are enacted or reformed. The following is annotated listing of those briefs related to family, education, civil rights and employment law.

Family Law

Adoption
• In re Adoption of Baby Z, 1999
• In re Adoption of CCG and ZCG, 2000
• In re Adoption of RBF and RCF, 2000

Custody/Visitation

• Ireland v. Ireland, 1998
• State of Connecticut v. Anthony Vakilzaden, 1999
• Troxel v. Granville, 1999
• T.B. v. L.R.M., 2001

Child Support
• Boris v. Blaisdell, 1985
• Bowen v. Gilliard, 1987

Divorce and Property Distribution – Pension Plans
• Tirmenstein v. Tirmenstein, 1989
• Adams v. Adams, 1989
• Berrington v. Berrington, 1993
• Krafick v. Krafick, 1995

Education Law

Athletics/Title IX

• Cook v. Colgate University, 1993
• Cohen v. Brown University, 1996
• Klinger v. Department of Corrections, 1997
• Boucher v. Syracuse University, 1999
• Curetan v. NCAA, 1999
• Smith v. NCAA, 2001
• Brentwwod Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, 2000
• Communities for Equity v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, 2003

Sexual Harassment (School)
• Rowinsky v. Bryan Independent School District, 1996 (school – peer sexual harassment)
• Bruneau v. South Kortright School District, 1998 (school – employer liability)
• Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 1999 (school – peer harassment)
• Murrell v. School District No. 1, 1999 (school – peer harassment)
• Reed v. Edelwich, 1996 (school – employer liability)
• Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 1998 (school – employer liability)
• Canty v. Old Rochester Regional School District, 1999 (school - § 1983 + Title IX)
• Gleason v. Board of Trustees of Salem State College, 2000 (school - § 1983 + Title IX)
• Litman v. George Mason University (open), 2001



Civil Rights/Equal Rights

Discrimination – Language Proficiency

• Alexander v. Sandoval, 2000

Discrimination – Sexual Orientation
• Steffan v. Aspin, 1994
• Romer v. Evans, 1996
• Thomas v. Anchorage, 2000
• CHRO/John-Jane Doe, 2000
• Boy Scouts of America v. Wyman, 2003

Domestic Violence
• Freedom of Information Commission v. Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven, Inc., 1998
• Doe v. Doe, 1996
• Culberson v. Doan, 1998
• White v. El Gabri; Bentley v. El Gabri, 1998

Reproductive Health – Buffer Zones
• Pro-Choice Network of Western New York v. Schenck, 1995
• Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, 1997
• United States and Connecticut v. Scott, 1999
• Hill v. Colorado, 2000
• People of the State of New York v. Operation Rescue National, 2001
• McGuire v. Reilly, 2001

Reproductive Health – Other

• Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 1989
• Hodgson v. Minnesota, 1989
• Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 1989
• Turner v. Ragsdale, 1989
• Rust v. Sullivan together with New York v. Sullivan, 1991
• Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 1992
• Winters v. Costco, 1995
• Hope v. Perales, 1995
• Letter to EEOC on Contraceptive Coverage, 1999
• Stenberg v. Carhart, 2000
• Bost v. Low-Income Women of Texas, 2002

Sexual Assault
• United States v. Lanier, 1997
• Commonwealth v. Fischer, 1998
• Letter to the FBI regarding the definition of rape for purposes of the Uniform Crime Report (UCR), 2001
• In re Jonathan; Matthew G. v. State of Connecticut, 2002

Employment Issues

Employment Discrimination
• Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc, 1996
• Bryan County v. Brown, 1997

Sex Discrimination
• Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte, 1987
• United Auto Workers (UAW) v. Johnson Controls, 1991
• J.E.B. v. Alabama ex. rel. T.B., 1994
• State of Connecticut v. Walker, 1994
• Faulkner v. Jones (the Citadel case), 1995
• United States of America v. Virginia, 1995
• United States of America v. Virginia, 1996

Sexual Harassment (Work)
• Newsday, Inc. v. Long Island Typographical Union, No. 915, 1990
• Comments to Proposed Guidelines on Harassment Based on Race, Color, Religion, Gender, National Origin, Age, and Disability, 1993
• Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 1993
• Gary v. Long, 1995
• CHRO ex. Rel. Bilodeau v. United Technologies, Pratt & Whitney, 1996
• Angelsea Productions v. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, 1996
• Jenson v. Eleventh Taconite Co, 1997
• Keslar v. Bartu, 2000
• Brittell v. State of Connecticut Department of Corrections, 1998
• Oncale v. Sundowner, 1998
• Rocque v. Freedom of Information Commission, 2001
• Pollard v. DuPont, 2001

Discrimination – Pregnancy
• In re Valerie D., 1992
• Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 2000
FMLA
• Testimony and Comments to the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Regarding the Family and Medical Leave Act, 1996
• Hibbs v. Nevada Department of Human Resources, 2003


 



Legal Education
Info & Referral Service
Frequently Asked Questions
Community Education

Public Policy & Advocacy
Legislative Advocacy
Legal Advocacy
Research & Evaluation
CT Girls & Technology Network



 

The Campaign for a Working Connecticut (CWCT) is a coalition with an aligned vision for Connecticut: To promote the state's economic competitiveness through the development of sustainable, effective workforce solutions to increase workers' skills and advance families to self-sufficiency. Read More


© 2003 CWEALF. All rights reserved.
Web Site Design by Adell Donaghue Design